Unilateral Training for Lifelong Strength

Maintaining lower-body strength and stability is essential for both healthy aging and long-term athletic performance. With age, declines in muscle power, balance, and coordination increase fall risk and reduce independence. For athletes, imbalances and joint stress shorten careers if not addressed. Split squats—a family of unilateral squat variations—offer a science-backed strategy to strengthen the legs, hips, and core in ways that bilateral lifts cannot.

Unlike traditional squats, split squats involve an asymmetrical stance: one foot forward, one foot back. This shifts most of the load to the lead leg, forcing the glutes, quads, hamstrings, and stabilizers to coordinate under single-leg demand. The result is a movement that not only builds strength but also improves hip and knee stability, glute activation, and proprioception—all critical for athletic resilience and fall prevention.

This article explores the biomechanics and benefits of split squats, highlights key variations, compares them with bilateral squats, and provides practical programming insights for coaches, athletes, and aging adults alike.

Split Squat Variations and Benefits

Standard Split Squat

Also known as the stationary lunge, this version keeps both feet planted while lowering the hips straight down and up. It emphasizes controlled motion, with the lead leg bearing most of the load. Because the stance is stable, the standard split squat is widely used in rehab and beginner settings to rebuild unilateral strength without excessive balance demands. Older adults or novices often find it an accessible entry point to single-leg training.

Rear-Foot Elevated Split Squat (Bulgarian Split Squat)

By elevating the back foot on a bench, the Bulgarian split squat increases the range of motion and places greater demand on the hip extensors. Research shows it activates the gluteus maximus and hamstrings to a greater degree than bilateral squats while requiring lighter external loads, reducing stress on the spine and knees. Athletes and strength enthusiasts prize this variation for its hypertrophy potential and sport transfer, though it demands more balance and stability.

Front-Foot Elevated Split Squat

Elevating the lead foot by a few inches allows deeper hip and knee flexion, enhancing glute activation and hip mobility. This variation can be more comfortable for those with knee pain, as it shifts demand toward the posterior chain. Coaches often use it to improve mobility or bias glutes in programming.

Assisted Split Squats

Using supports such as suspension trainers, rails, or light fingertip assistance makes split squats accessible for older adults, those with balance issues, or individuals in rehabilitation. Assisted versions maintain strength stimulus for the lead leg while reducing fear of falling and encouraging proper mechanics.

Split squats redistribute forces across the lower body differently from bilateral squats. Because the lead leg does most of the work, effective training loads can be achieved with lighter external resistance. This reduces spinal compression compared to heavy back squats—an important advantage for lifters with back pain or older adults with reduced tolerance for axial loading.

Step length and torso angle dictate whether the exercise is more knee-dominant (short stance, upright torso) or hip-dominant (long stance, forward lean). Longer stances and front-foot elevation increase glute and hamstring recruitment without adding knee stress. Importantly, studies show split squats elicit similar quadriceps and glute activation as back squats at half the load, making them joint-friendly yet effective.

Another biomechanical advantage lies in stabilizer recruitment. The gluteus medius and core musculature must resist rotation and lateral sway, training hip and trunk stability critical for gait, athletic movements, and injury prevention. This unilateral demand helps correct asymmetries often masked by bilateral lifts.

Split squats excel at glute development. Because the lead hip often travels through a deeper flexion-extension arc than in bilateral squats, the gluteus maximus is strongly recruited. EMG studies confirm that rear-foot elevated split squats can match or exceed glute activation seen in heavy back squats while using lighter loads.

The gluteus medius and minimus also play a crucial stabilizing role, preventing hip drop and knee valgus. This has implications for reducing ACL injury risk in athletes and improving gait stability in older adults. Quadriceps, adductors, hamstrings, and calves all contribute meaningfully, making the split squat a comprehensive lower-body exercise.

Offset loading (e.g., holding a dumbbell in one hand) further increases core and hip stabilizer activation, simulating real-life asymmetrical tasks like carrying groceries or sports maneuvers.

Falls are a leading cause of injury and loss of independence in older adults. Split squats inherently train balance because the body’s center of mass shifts over a narrowed base of support. This forces constant proprioceptive adjustments and strengthens the neuromuscular system responsible for coordination.

Research shows leg strength, especially in the quadriceps, strongly predicts reduced fall risk and even mortality in older adults. Split squats improve single-leg strength while simultaneously challenging balance, providing a dual benefit rarely matched by machine-based or bilateral exercises. Over time, trainees gain confidence in functional tasks like stair climbing, stepping onto curbs, or catching themselves after a stumble.

Athletes also benefit: single-leg stability carries over to sprinting, cutting, and change-of-direction skills. By conditioning stabilizers and improving interlimb coordination, split squats enhance both performance and injury resilience.

Back squats remain unmatched for building maximal absolute strength. However, they also impose significant spinal and joint loading, which may not be appropriate for all populations. Split squats provide comparable muscular activation with less load, sparing the spine and knees while correcting asymmetries.

Functionally, unilateral training better mirrors everyday and sport movements, which are often single-leg dominant. For athletes, this specificity improves transfer. For aging adults, it means greater confidence in daily mobility.

Rather than replacing bilateral lifts, split squats complement them. A well-rounded program might alternate phases emphasizing bilateral loading with phases focused on unilateral training, balancing maximal strength with joint health and functional capacity.

Programming and Coaching Takeaways

• Older adults and beginners: Start with assisted or standard split squats, 2–3 sets of 8–12 reps per leg. Focus on balance, alignment, and confidence before progressing to load or elevation.

• General fitness clients: Incorporate variations for both strength and hypertrophy. Bulgarian split squats can serve as primary lifts (3–4 sets of 6–10 reps). Offset loading or tempo work (slow eccentrics) can intensify stimulus.

• Athletes and advanced lifters: Program heavy Bulgarian split squats in low-rep ranges (3–6 reps) for unilateral strength and symmetry. Contrast methods (pairing with plyometrics) can improve power transfer to sport.

• Coaching cues: Use a half-kneeling setup to establish stance, keep hips squared, and cue “push through the heel” to engage glutes. Depth should be progressive, respecting mobility and comfort.

Ultimately, split squats are adaptable to nearly any level. With minimal equipment, they can be scaled from assisted bodyweight versions to heavy barbell loads, making them one of the most versatile lower-body exercises for strength and longevity.

Split squats offer a scientifically grounded, joint-friendly alternative to bilateral squats that addresses strength, balance, and functional stability simultaneously. They activate the glutes and hip stabilizers intensely, correct asymmetries, reduce spinal loading, and improve fall resistance. For aging adults, they translate directly into independence and reduced injury risk. For athletes, they build unilateral strength and sport-specific resilience.

By integrating split squat variations into training, coaches and individuals alike can cultivate lower-body strength that endures—supporting both performance in the present and independence in later life.

1. Song, Q., Ma, M., Liu, H., et al. (2023). Effects of step lengths on biomechanical characteristics of lower extremity during split squat movement. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 11, 1277493.

2. Mackey, E. R., & Riemann, B. L. (2021). Biomechanical differences between the Bulgarian split-squat and back squat. International Journal of Exercise Science, 14(1), 533–543.

3. Schellenberg, F., Taylor, W. R., & Lorenzetti, S. (2017). Towards evidence-based strength training: a comparison of muscle forces during deadlifts, good mornings, and split squats. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, 9(1), 13.

4. DeForest, B. A., Cantrell, G. S., & Schilling, B. K. (2014). Muscle activity in single- vs. double-leg squats. International Journal of Exercise Science, 7(4), 302–310.

5. Newman, A. B., et al. (2006). Strength, but not muscle mass, is associated with mortality in the Health, Aging and Body Composition Study. Journals of Gerontology Series A, 61(1), 72–77.

6. Sherrington, C., et al. (2019). Exercise for preventing falls in older people living in the community. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (1): CD012424.

7. Felicio, L. R., et al. (2011). Biomechanical comparisons between exercises performed with and without equipment: squats vs. split squats. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 25(11), 3195–3202.

8. Hamlyn, N., Behm, D. G., & Young, W. B. (2007). Trunk muscle activation during dynamic weight-training exercises and isometric instability activities. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 21(4), 1108–1112.

9. Boyle, M. (2016). New Functional Training for Sports. Human Kinetics.